Innova Tech is Going to Stop You From Losing Things

Innova Tech is Going to Stop You From Losing Things

    Feb 3, 2012

Bernard Leong on Internet Trends and Entrepreneurship in Southeast Asia

Bernard Leong on Internet Trends and Entrepreneurship in Southeast Asia

    Feb 5, 2012

SpellDial Wants to Make Phone Numbers History

SpellDial Wants to Make Phone Numbers History

    Feb 3, 2012

A Final Roundup of Startups in Asia Singapore

A Final Roundup of Startups in Asia Singapore

    Feb 6, 2012

The Google Revenue Equation

googleA discussion I had in a class has inspired me to write this post.

A couple of days ago, my Professor asked a intriguing question: “Do you think Nexus One is able to overtake the iPhone?” Immediately, the body language of my peers suggests a definite no.

It isn’t hard to explain why. Some said that the sheer number of iPhone apps are enough to kill, while some said that Google doesn’t have the ability to market a physical product.

While it is true that Google is trying to get a significant part of the pie in the mobile phone industry, it is not for the mere profit of  selling phones. Google is not in the business of selling phones, it is in the business of selling ads.

And that explains the “Google Revenue Equation.”

I have taken this term from Ben Parr, who has written a beautiful piece about it.

In a nutshell, the Google Revenue Equation is simply:

Revenue = Time Spent On Web

Yes, Google’s business model relies heavily on advertising; and more time spent on the web means more exposure to Google ads. Whatever it owns, acquires and creates are all geared toward making us spend more time on the web. Reality is, almost all websites in the world are hosting Google Ads.

google products

Google has probably predicted long ago that mobile would be the next big thing. Not only has it introduced the Nexus One, it has also acquired AdMob for $750 million. Serving mobile ads makes perfect sense. The more time you spend on mobile web and apps, the more money Google makes. Whether Nexus One can turn a profit isn’t the issue, the key is to get people to go mobile.

In Q4 2009, android phones accounted for 27% of Smartphone mobile ad impressions in the U.S. The growth is looking good and is expected to leap with the launch of Nexus One.

smartphonewebads

Andy Rubin, vice president of engineering at Google, made the company’s goal clear:

nexus one“Our primary business is advertising… a superphone [like Nexus One] is a great way to access the Web, and that… supports our whole business model, which is advertising,” he said. The new phone and store represent “the next front of our core business,” he added.

Google is not trying to make a profit on sales of the Nexus, said Rubin. Instead, it’s trying to “make sure we have great access to Google services… and the best possible Web experience,” he explained. “You buy this and the advertising model takes off.”

With $6 billion revenue, seems like this equation is working, huh?

Tags: , ,

About Willis Wee

Founder of Penn Olson who is also an entrepreneur since 2005. He has had experience in crafting social media strategies for organizations such as Marriott Vacation Club, James Cook University, Reach Singapore and Unilever. Contact him at willis[at]penn-olson[dot]com

SHARE THIS POST?
Subscribe to our RSS Feed, or follow us on Twitter
or simply recommend us to friends.
  • googlefanblog

    I am amazed how the people inside Google really think far far ahead of the internet business. Able to search on the phone is really great. I was into a middle of conversation and a nice topic popped up that we needed to verify the facts. My friend immediately googled it using his phone, and huala! We verified the information instantly and the conversation became more smooth.

  • http://twitter.com/williswee Willis Wee

    cool. i glad this piece helped :)

  • http://twitter.com/gr33ndata Tarek Amr

    As I can see from your post, Google's main goal is to make people spend more time online with their mobile phones, and not selling more mobile phones. So does this mean that they will ignore many useful phone feature and focus on the primary goal instead? Also since selling mobiles is not their main goal, I – as a user – shouldn't trust their mobile phones?

  • http://twitter.com/williswee Willis Wee

    good angle Tarek. But i doubt Google would neglect quality in its phones. Note that google is interested to gain a sizable market share in the smartphone market and only quality can bring you that far.

    Another angle would be to assume that Google (in the future) might slash the price to make the phone more affordable to the masses. Since the phone profit doesn't really matter.

  • vitasecondumnex

    I think from a very long time ago, Google had its main revenue source from Online ads (viz. AdSense/AdWords)

    The mobile is one of its innovations and cannot be considered as a revenue generator. As far as I know, google is very clear on it's revenue making model via online advtg.

    Wonderful article. I loved the statistics, especially. Very detailed.

  • http://twitter.com/williswee Willis Wee

    thanks ! :)

  • http://twitter.com/matthart matthart

    I think that Google's slow foray into all things connected is disrupting every traditional business model. Rather than consumer pays – for phones, for GPS devices, for applications – Google will actually pay for the phone, GPS device, and apps via advertising. Stocks in companies that provide GPS mapping data tanked when Google introduced its navigation beta into Android phones. My Droid works great for GPS, with more details spoken than my Maggelan. What happens when Google pays car makers to include a Droid, that includes phone service? “Exit right in half a mile. Check out the Radio Shack after you exit for great deals on remote control cars.”

    - Matt H

  • http://twitter.com/williswee Willis Wee

    yeap. spot on! that's their business model.

    And having google droid in cars is always a possibility. It's google that we're talking about :)

  • http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/02/07/parisian-love-could-be-googles-super-bowl-ad-video/ Parisian Love Could Be Google’s Super Bowl Ad [VIDEO] | Penn Olson

    [...] Branding wise, the ad cements Google as the world’s best search engine. This is especially important with its recent NexusOne launch. I’m guessing people could be confused (from a non-geek perspective) what direction Google is taking. This commercial reminds people that Google is still very much in the search business. It’s still all part of the Google revenue equation. [...]

  • http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/02/10/nobody-likes-google-buzz/ Nobody Likes Google Buzz? | Penn Olson

    [...] Google is a company that struggles with social network; the failure of Orkut is a good example. But on a fair note, Blogger and YouTube are both doing fairly well, despite the absence of revenue stream. It’s unfair to write off Google Buzz just a day after its launch. Be patient and hope Google would work its magic. [...]

  • http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/02/16/should-you-use-google-buzz/ Should You Use Google Buzz? | Penn Olson

    [...] together and present them in an user-friendly fashion. After all, if Google is playing by their revenue equation, this makes perfect [...]

  • http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/03/28/iad-apples-new-weapon-against-google/ iAd, Apple’s New Weapon Against Google? | Penn Olson

    [...] This comes as no surprise after Apple hinted its intention by acquiring Quattro in January this year. With no clear dominant player in the mobile ad market so far, Apple is picking up pace to ensure that it gains the first mover advantage. If iAd were to be announced, it could prove to be a big blow to Google’s revenue model. [...]

  • http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/06/17/the-why-how-of-google-tv-video/ The Why & How Of Google TV [VIDEO] | Penn Olson

    [...] web, Google earns. And Google TV is built to convert part of our TV time to web time. It’s the Google revenue equation at work. But, who would mind having such an awesome product? It’s “free” [...]

Switch to our mobile site